Notice Regarding Ongoing Obstruction of Access to the Court

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Case No. 0:25-cv-02056-DWF-DJF

TO: The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Kellye Strickland respectfully submits this notice to apprise the Court of ongoing irregularities within the underlying state court proceedings, Lee v. Strickland, Case No. 62-HR-CV-24-963. These events form a central basis for the federal claims asserted herein and further demonstrate the absence of any meaningful remedy at the state level.

I. Conciliation Court Proceedings

Details irregular docketing, dismissed motion without ruling, hearing convened without notice, delayed mailing of dismissal order, improper rejection and delayed acceptance of removal filing, and prejudicial handling of claim.

II. LPRB Determination Letter

Identifies factual errors, mischaracterizations, and legal misstatements in the LPRB's response regarding Defendant Kyle Manderfeld, including fabricated claims and failure to analyze key issues.

III. Manderfeld’s August 13–14, 2025 Filings and AGO Appearance

Outlines a sequence of filings: an unauthorized continuance request filed in Plaintiff’s name, a collateral estoppel memo, and the immediate appearance of the Attorney General’s Office. Correspondence confirms no direct coordination was denied, but indirect coordination remains unaccounted for.

IV. Outcome of Judge Starr’s Ruling

Details the court’s reliance on estoppel doctrines while disregarding jurisdictional defects, unsigned orders, altered records, and ADA violations. Notes refusal to swear in Plaintiff or consider procedural defects.

V. Preservation for the Federal Record

1. Improper conciliation court handling with prejudicial dismissal;
2. Oversight agency misstatements regarding named defendants;
3. Fabrication of alleged claims and misapplication of professional conduct review standards;
4. Unauthorized communication by Defendant Manderfeld with state judge during litigation;
5. Appearance of coordination between Manderfeld and AGO filings on estoppel theory;
6. State court dismissal of Plaintiff’s motion based on estoppel despite void underlying order and ADA violations.

Dated: August 21, 2025

/s/ Kellye Strickland
Kellye Strickland
6445 S Maple Ave, Apt 2006
Tempe, AZ 85283
kellye.sundar@gmail.com
(603) 892-8666
Plaintiff, Pro Se